Presentation Materials
Analyst Meeting Q&A (Earnings Release For the Six Months Ended September 30, 2015)
Announced on October 30, 2015
Please be advised that the following text has been edited/modified from the original Q&A conversations for the sake of clarity.
-
Questioner No. 1
Q1 Your revised full-year guidance can be easily explained by the 20 billion-yen upward revision of the projected operating income from Smart life business, and the additional cost reduction of 10 billion yen. However, your mobile communications services revenues recorded an increase of approximately 10 billion yen in the second quarter alone. As you have also made an upward revision to your full-year ARPU guidance, I believe your operating revenues will also come in higher than your initial projection. What are your views concerning the potential upside to your services revenues?
Open
Q2 Will it then be correct to understand that your operating income guidance that was revised upwards would be influenced by how things will unfold in the second half, such as the trend of ARPU or the expenses required in the peak season?
Open
Q3 This is a question relating to your response to the policies contemplated by the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications (MIC). Creation of a new billing option catered to the needs of low ARPU users is one of the topics discussed. In my view, creation of a new data plan with a monthly ceiling of 1GB could become a potential solution to this issue. In the case of DOCOMO, I believe there is a good number of users subscribing to your 2GB plan. If, hypothetically, you decided to create a 1GB plan, how do you think it will impact your income? Can you comment on the potential impacts, both positive and negative, on your income resulting from the creation of such a plan?
Open
Q4 Generally speaking, introduction of a new billing plan causes a certain level of negative impact, but on the other hand, it could also induce a natural increase in subscriptions that could absorb such negative impacts. What are your views?
Open
-
Questioner No. 2
Q1 Which category of service made the greatest contribution to the income growth of Smart life business and Other businesses?
Open
Q2 Your full-year ARPU projection appears to be somewhat low vis-a-vis the steady pace of ARPU recovery. If you have not factored into the revised forecast any rate revisions in response to the deliberations by the government task force, do you expect any other uncertainties in your plan? I believe you should be able to achieve an operating income higher than the revised forecast of 710 billion yen if your ARPU continues to improve at the current pace, but what are your views?
Open
Q3 You raised a target to achieve 820 billion yen or higher in operating income for FY2017. In your current projection, how much, in concrete terms, do you think you can achieve?
Open
-
Questioner No. 3
Q1 Regarding your revised operating income forecast, the level of income projected for the second half appears to be too small relative to the track record in the first half. Should I consider this a conservative estimate?
Open
Q2 This time around, you also revised your capital expenditures guidance downward from previously 630 billion yen to 600 billion yen. Is there a possibility to seek further reduction to the 500 billion yen level?
Open
Q3 You set a target to generate 100 billion yen in operating income from Smart life business and Other businesses in FY2017. Can we only expect an increase of 15 billion yen per annum in the next two years?
Open
-
Questioner No. 4
Q1 What are the reasons behind the non-operating losses of 15.2 billion yen?
Open
Q2 According to your revised handset sales forecast, you made an upward revision to the number of handsets to be sold as well as the projected number of i-mode and sp-mode subscriptions. On the other hand, you revised your smartphone sales outlook downwards. What is the rationale for this? Does this imply the handset replacement cycle is getting longer than before?
Open
Q3 I believe the greatest opportunity for you to sell your various Smart life-related services would be the point of sale of your handsets. Wouldn't the slowdown of handset sales affect the sales performance of your various Smart life-related services?
Open
-
Questioner No. 5
Q1 You mentioned that your mobile communications revenues recorded a year-on-year increase even when the impact of the "Monthly Support" discounts was included in the calculation. Do you think this growth trend is sustainable? Or, were there any irregular factors that lead to the positive outcome?
Open
Q2 In which CAPEX item have you achieved savings? I understand that you were able to cut down on your LTE-related CAPEX due to technical advancements, but besides that, were you able to achieve reduction in other areas?
Open
-
Questioner No. 6
Q1 I assume that your handset sales data include those of MVNOs. When the sales by MVNOs are excluded, how different will the full-year handset sales forecast look like?
Open
Q2 You revised your full-year handset sales forecast upward by 1.6 million units. Is it correct to understand that this is driven by the increase of MVNO sales?
Open
Q3 When I look at the matters to be reviewed by the government task force, it seems that the task force intends to address the issue of how to respond to the requests of users who do not need unlimited voice plans. As far as I understand, you currently offer only one option, the "Kake-hodai" unlimited voice plan, for voice service. How do you plan to respond, if the government sets out a direction requiring you to accommodate the needs of users who do not prefer unlimited voice plans?
Open