Presentation Materials
Analyst Meeting Q&A (Earnings Release For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2015)
Announced on July 29, 2015
Please be advised that the following text has been edited/modified from the original Q&A conversations for the sake of clarity.
-
Questioner No. 1
Q1 With respect to your operating income from the smart lifebusiness and other businesses, although you may need to anticipate some costs in the second half of the year in relation to the launch of the new "d point" service in December, I believe income generation of 23 billion in the first three months of the year was faster than your earlier expectations. How do you foresee the income outlook for the full year?
Open
Q2 Your full-year capital expenditure guidance estimates a year-on-year decrease of 32 billion yen, but you already achieved a reduction of 55 billion yen in the three months through June 30, 2015. Although you mentioned that the progress in the first quarter was slightly behind your plan, I believe you are very well positioned to achieve your full-year CAPEX guidance of 630 billion yen if the current pace is maintained. What are your views?
Open
Q3 Regarding your data ARPU and smartphone sales, users' overall data usage has been rising due to growth in the number of users choosing "Data M pack" or larger data buckets and the increase in 1GB data top-up rate. However, the year-on-year increase in the number of smartphones sold was limited to 7%. Because subscribers' data usage is expanding, I think you can justify more aggressive handset sales efforts. What do you think?
Open
-
Questioner No. 2
Q1 Because of the impact of the new billing plan and other factors, I assume the targets that you set in your business plan for the first quarter were quite stretched, but I believe you achieved results exceeding those targets nonetheless. How do you assess your performance vis-a-vis your initial plan?
Open
Q2 The full-year data ARPU (excluding the impact of discounts) is estimated to be 3,210 yen. The actual data ARPU for FY2015/1Q came in at 3,210 yen, so you already achieved your full-year guidance. You also mentioned that you have been successful in upselling customers to larger data buckets. Do you foresee any risks going forward, because it is very unlikely that your data ARPU would remain flat at the FY2015/1Q level?
Open
Q3 If everything, i.e., ARPU, cost reduction and revenue generation at subsidiaries, is going well, there will naturally be heightened expectations for the Company. How much more can we expect from you?
Open
Q4 We hear news about the switch of accounting standard to IFRS by the entire NTT Group and the resulting change in depreciation calculation method. When I compare the balance sheets, you have the highest depreciation rate among the different NTT companies, so you will be most significantly affected by this change. I believe NTT is contemplating to introduce the new accounting standard in FY2016 at the earliest. How prepared are you in this regard? Also, can you share with us if you achieve an upside in your income, to what extent can you make adjustments, for example, by accelerating the depreciation of some items?
Open
-
Questioner No. 3
Q1 In relation to the ARPU, what are the reasons behind the expanded impact of "Monthly Support" discount program compared to the previous quarter? Also, how do you foresee the ARPU trajectory for FY2015/Q2 and beyond?
Open
Q2 Regarding your smart life business and other businesses, how do you analyze the performance of "dmarket services" and your subsidiaries?
Open
Q3 Do you have any plans to conduct share repurchases during this fiscal year?
Open
-
Questioner No. 4
Q1 The operating income from the smart life business recorded an increase of 9.9 billion yen year-on-year. Out of this, can you quantify the positive impact from the recognition of impairment losses in relation to the business of mmbi, Inc.?
Open
Q2 Will it then be appropriate to consider that businesses other than mmbi, Inc. made positive contributions to your operating income expansion, mostly through organic growth as opposed to cost reduction?
Open
Q3 You mentioned that the amount of transactions handled by smart life business and other businesses totaled 2.7 trillion yen. Does that include the transactions handled by "dmarket" and your credit business?
Open
Q4 Out of this amount, how much does the credit portion account for?
Open
-
Questioner No. 5
Q1 Your operational data and income generation are faring very well. The fundamentals are improving. Although there might have been delays in the accrual of some expense items, you still have generated favorable amount of income as a result. Toward the second half of the year, you have a plan to align the various service brands to start with the letter "d." This, in my view, will offer a great opportunity for you to redefine your brand. What are your thoughts pertaining to the positioning of the "d" brands, i.e., your telecommunications services, credit card business, the connectivity of network and luxuriousness of your offerings? Do you plan to present a value proposition as a premium brand with the introduction of the new "d" brands?
Open
Q2 In your DCMX credit business, you offer gold cards. Since you have a lot of long-term users in your customer base, I think it makes sense to offer some premium services targeting those high-value customers. And, depending on how skillfully you package these premium services, you may be able to change consumers' perception on your brand. I understand the rationale behind the "+d" value co-creation efforts, but credit card business can have ripple effects on your mobile communications business. If you can clearly explain your targets and aims when somebody raises a question about the difference between "d card" and "Rakuten Card," I believe you will be able to exert the total strengths of your company. Specifically, what are you planning to offer, for example, in your credit card business with the roll-out of "+d" in the second half of the year?
Open
Q3 Your network connectivity is getting better, and your customer support service enjoys good reviews thanks to the efforts undertaken over the last several years. I believe we are now seeing a turn of tide to your favor. I hope you will successfully manage your branding in the second half of the year.
Open
-
Questioner No. 6
Q1 Let me ask a question from the perspective of the sustainability of the improved ARPU trend. Do you think the better-than-expected ARPU performance in FY2015/1Q was driven by the strong number of upsells, or was it because you made a conservative forecast in the first place? Also, you mentioned that the percentage of users choosing "Data M pack" or larger buckets account for approximately 70%. Can we expect that you will be able to beat your full-year data ARPU guidance if this trend continues?
Open
Q2 The competition in the market seems to have stabilized in the recent months. Is there anything that you have to be wary of for its potential impact on your results? Can you also share your views on the general mood of the market?
Open
-
Questioner No. 7
Q1 Your top line seems to be relatively stable, you said you achieved cost reduction exceeding your initial plan and capital expenditures were almost in line with your plan. Regarding your cost-cutting efforts, are there any cost targets that appear "too stretched" in your view or any cost items that were merely "postponed" in execution? Do you think you can sustain the current pace of cost reduction going forward, or do you anticipate any factors that may result in a change of course?
Open